1inch
Aggregated token liquidity with intent-based and cross-chain product modes.
Compare each DEX aggregator or swap platform by routing, execution and cost model. A crypto swap comparison should use the same assets and network, then account for every separately charged cost.
Aggregated token liquidity with intent-based and cross-chain product modes.
Trading built around batch auctions and matching compatible orders.
Solana swaps with multiple routing paths and a broader on-chain product suite.
A multichain DEX with multiple pool types and programmable Infinity fees.
Pool-based token swaps, with fee structures that change across versions and pools.
Try a different name or network, or explore another category.
Historical and discontinued profiles stay at the bottom. No paid placements. Documentation does not establish transaction performance. Select up to three profiles to compare.
A DEX aggregator combines access to liquidity from multiple decentralized exchanges. Depending on its execution mode, a route may use several pools or an intent-based system. A pool-based DEX and an aggregator therefore need different comparisons. 1inch product overview ↗.
Start with 1inch for aggregation and intent-based modes, Jupiter for Solana routing, or CoW Swap for batch-auction execution. Each profile explains its scope and evidence.
Use the same token contracts, networks, input amount and observation time. Compare quoted output and separately charged network or interface costs. Liquidity coverage and a low advertised fee do not guarantee the best result for every trade.
0 selected